From 507b2772d36ca1ce50b7df061b41ebb093e1fb76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: BibaBot Jarvis Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 10:06:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] feat: add issue #124 for RBAC implementation --- ISSUE-124.md | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ISSUE-124.md diff --git a/ISSUE-124.md b/ISSUE-124.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bf9f349 --- /dev/null +++ b/ISSUE-124.md @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +# Issue #124: Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for API Endpoints + +## Description + +Implement role-based access control (RBAC) for the API endpoints to ensure that users can only perform actions allowed by their role (`user`, `moderator`, `admin`). This includes: + +- Middleware to check user roles on protected routes +- Integration with JWT claims +- Audit logging for sensitive actions +- Documentation of the RBAC model + +## Acceptance Criteria + +- [ ] JWT middleware extracts role from token +- [ ] `requireRole` middleware implemented and tested +- [ ] All existing API endpoints have appropriate role checks +- [ ] Sensitive actions are logged with audit events +- [ ] Documentation updated to reflect RBAC implementation +- [ ] Tests added for role-based access + +## Tasks + +1. Implement `requireRole` middleware in `backend/middleware/role.middleware.js` +2. Add role checks to existing API routes +3. Integrate role checking into JWT authentication flow +4. Implement audit logging for sensitive actions +5. Update documentation (`docs/roles-and-permissions.md`) +6. Write tests for RBAC functionality + +## Notes + +This is a follow-up to the existing roles and permissions documentation in `docs/roles-and-permissions.md`. The implementation should align with the defined roles and permissions matrix. \ No newline at end of file